| 
  Sample 11 Days Plan for an Ecumenical Celebration 
  
ECUMENICAL DAY  OF WORSHIP 
  (DIFFERENT  FAITH COMMUNITIES WORSHIPING TOGETHER) 
CULTURAL RESOURCES  
Sunday, August 30,  2009 
Meri-li Douglas,  Guest Cultural Resource Commentator and  Bernice Johnson Reagon, Lectionary  Cultural Resource Team Commentator 
Micah 4:3-4  
   
   3  He will judge between many peoples  
         and will settle disputes for strong  nations far and wide.  
         They will beat their swords into  plowshares  
         and their spears into pruning hooks.  
         Nation will not take up sword against nation,  
         nor will they train for war anymore.  
   4  Every man will sit under his own vine  
         and under his own fig tree,  
         and no one will make them afraid,  
         for the LORD Almighty has spoken. 
   
I. Introduction: A Song  for this Moment on the Lectionary Calendar 
Gonna Lay Down My  Sword and Shield  
Gonna lay down my sword and shield 
  Down by the riverside 
  Down by the riverside 
  Down by the riverside 
  Gonna lay down my sword and shield.   
  Down by the riverside 
  Ain't gonna study war no more. 
Chorus: I ain't  gonna study war no more.  
  I ain't gonna study war no more, 
  Study war no more. 
  I ain't gonna study war no more, 
  I ain't gonna study war no more, 
  Study war no more. 
Other lines: 
  I’m gonna lay down my burden… 
  Gonna stick my sword in the golden sand… 
  Gonna put on my long white robe…   
  Gonna put on my starry crown… 
Contemporary lines: 
  Going to lay down the bombs and guns… 
  Going to join hands the whole world round…1 
II. Etymology and Historical Notes 
   
Ecumenism (ecumenical) is based on the Greek word “oikoumene”  from its Greek root oikos meaning  both “house” and “world.” Early Christians used the word “oikoumene” when  referring to the One   Church, that is, all  Christian communities throughout the known world.2 Over the  centuries, the Church expanded into vastly and distinctively diverse cultural  milieus and geographical locations. For eleven centuries, all these diverse  communities remained bonded by two things: 1) the baptismal acceptance of a  common calling to Christian discipleship; and 2) the single biblical origin  when all were “of one accord” on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-21).  
Early Christian leaders held regularly scheduled church  council meetings. Until the eleventh century, these gatherings were held to celebrate  the One Church, the One Body of Christ. It was  also the time when church leaders addressed practical issues: to articulate scriptural  interpretations, to draft creedal statements, and to determine a process for  structuring itself as a single social institution. As the church expanded  geographically, the increasingly diverse cultural and social norms created  schisms of theological understandings and faith expressions that became  impossible to reconcile.3   
In the year 1054, the seventh such council was held, and  it was there that the Church experienced its first division and the formation  of the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church.4 It  was a pattern of institutional divisions that would repeat itself hundreds of  times throughout history, representing substantial and distinctly differing  interpretations of Christian discipleship. The ecumenical movements of the twentieth  and twenty-first centuries have been challenging Christians to re-establish the  unity of Christ and to celebrate the Church’s rich diversity. 
This long sought unity is not a call for uniformity but  unity as the One Body of Christ. Ecumenism is a challenge to all who would  declare Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior to celebrate common biblical and  historical groundings which are the common origins for all Christians of all configurations  throughout the world and all of history. 
III. Black  Ecumenism            
Mary R. Sawyer’s 1994 publication, Black Ecumenism:  Implementing the Demands of Justice, is  a comprehensive study of the history of interdenominational efforts among  African American churches to confront social injustices within this country.  Sawyer defines and provides an in-depth analysis of black ecumenism and the  ways in which it differs from other ecumenical activities within the larger  Christian church community. She identifies the common history of slavery from  which African American churches have emerged as providing an inherently  effective capacity to cooperatively witness for justice in the context of  faithful living.  
Many white Christians during this period of American  history failed to see the idolatry of manipulating the sacred scriptures to  justify the unparalleled brutality of slavery. Yet, many of the victims of  slavery found within the gospel a message of liberation that nurtured and  embraced their humanity and offered spiritual wholeness. The social systems of  evil designed by misguided Christians made it necessary for African American  slaves to separate themselves from White Christendom in order to experience the  redeeming grace of Jesus Christ.5  
What is the task of black ecumenism? Sawyer offers this  answer: 
The objective of black  ecumenism, unlike that of white ecumenical movements, is neither structural unity nor  doctrinal consensus; rather it is the bringing together of the manifold resources of the black  church to address the circumstances of African Americans as an oppressed  people. It is mission oriented, emphasizing black development and liberation; it is  directed toward securing a position of strength and self-sufficiency.6  
A traditional African American church song says: 
When all God’s children get together 
  What a time, what a time, what a time 
  We’re gonna sit on the banks of the river 
  What a time what a time what a time. 
Historically, the black church has been the manifestation  of saving grace for African Americans. In many practical ways, the church  united black people into a bulwark against a mighty unrelenting storm of  injustice. That sense of unity continues today, whether that conviction of  liberation is within African American denominations or among those African  American congregations existing as enclaves within predominately white  denominations. Throughout the years, the agenda for the black church has been multi-dimensional:  to introduce and nurture the concept of the soul, that within that was eternal,  to educate and empower their young, and to address the social and ethical  injustices that levy an unyielding barrage of discrepancies in employment,  housing, and health care.   
African American participation in ecumenical efforts  engineered by predominately white denominations have often overwhelmed, and perhaps  on occasion devalued, the African American religious experience. In his study, Social  Teachings of the Black Church, Peter Paris notes that when black churches  join forces, their agenda is more likely to reflect the ideal of equal among  equals based on the oneness of a “shared ethical principle of racial  liberation, which in turn derives from the principle of the parenthood of God  and the kinship of all people.”7 
Thus, historically, it has not been a question of  theological debates because such efforts did not address those social justice  issues that were more compelling for African American communities.  Capitalizing on the oneness that comes from  a common history and cultural context simply makes ecumenical efforts among  African American churches more “do-able.”   
IV.  Ecumenical Interfaith Services 
In contemporary expressions, Ecumenical services have  featured shared observances not only across Christian denominations but also  across faiths communities. These services reach beyond Christian family and  provide an opportunity for the coming together to share that which is resonant  with respect and acknowledgement of a world big enough for different ways of communal  life journeying.   
November 19, 2006, hosted by the Capitol Hill Seventh Day  Adventist Church in Washington,   DC, members from faith groups  gathered in an Ecumenical Interfaith Service of Thanksgiving. Participating  were Seventh Day Adventists, Buddhists, Lutherans, Episcopalians, Hebrews,  Catholics, the Unity   Church, Church of the  Brethren, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The planning committee  for the service had representation from all of the participating faith  communities.8 The actual service was amazing in its embrace. There  were three choral preludes, performed by three musicians; the candle lighting  litany was voiced by Muslim, Buddhist, Methodist, and Hebrew liturgists. And  Michele Riley Jones, the host church musician and African American lectionary  liturgist, led those gathered in this congregational song: 
This Is the Day 
This is the day, this is the day 
  That the Lord has made, that the Lord has made. 
  We will rejoice, we will rejoice 
  And be glad in it, and be glad in it. 
  This is the day that the Lord had made, 
  We will rejoice and be glad in it. 
  This is the day, this is the day, that the Lord has made.9  
V. The National  Council of Churches Showing What Ecumenism Can Do 
      
    They Will Know  We Are Christians by Our Love  (We Are  One in the Spirit) 
We are one in the Spirit. We are one in the Lord. 
  We are one in the Spirit. We are one in the Lord. 
  And we pray that all unity may one day be restored. 
Refrain: 
  And they’ll know we are Christians by our love, by our  love. 
  Yes, they’ll know we are Christians by our love. 
We will walk with each other. We will walk hand in hand.  (Repeat) 
  And together we will spread the news that God is in our  land. 
We will work with each other. We will work side by side. (Repeat) 
  And we’ll guard each one’s dignity and save each one’s  pride. 
All praise to our God from whom all things come. (Repeat) 
  And all praise to Christ Jesus who makes us one.10 
Since its founding in 1950, the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA  has been the leading force for ecumenical cooperation among Christians. The  NCC’s member faith groups come from a wide spectrum of Protestant, Anglican,  Orthodox, Evangelical, historically African American and Living Peace   Churches and include 45 million  people in more than one hundred local congregations across the nation.11  
NCC, the Ecumenical  Minority Bail Bond Fund, and the Dawson Five 
   
The Ecumenical Minority Bail Bond Fund (EMBBF) was established by the pooling  of funds by NCC member denominations to purchase treasury notes, which were  used as bail for people of color who were subjected to political harassment or  whose cases represented bail abuse or other circumstances that denied  defendants their rights. Upon completion of a defendant’s trial, the treasury  notes would be returned to the fund. The call to create such a fund was made by  Native American activists and spiritual leaders, and theologians and  administrators from mainline Christian churches attending the Native American  Consultation with the Churches. The consultation, which was likely the first  such gathering of its kind, was organized by the Interreligious Foundation for  Community Organization (IFCO) in 1975, which played a key role in the fund’s  implementation. IFCO was established in 1967 (Reverend Lucius Walker, Jr.,  founding executive director) as the first national ecumenical foundation  primarily committed to the support of community organizing.  At the time of the creation of the Ecumenical  Minority Bail Bond Fund, IFCO was a project inside of the NCC, and inside and  outside of that structure, IFCO acted as a bridge between predominantly  mainline churches and community groups conceived of and run by people of color.  It acted “as a broker for the channeling of interdenominational support, and as  a resource bank supporting the work of congregations and organizations engaged  in community-building.”12  
In the following account, Adisa Douglas, the NCC/IFCO  staff member who physically transported the bond, relates this account which  demonstrates the point that sometimes ecumenical work is cutting edge and  dangerous work: 
  
Two years after the inauguration of the Fund, it was  effective in securing bail for the young members of the Dawson Five case. The  five black youth who made up the Dawson Five were Roosevelt,  17, his brother Henderson, 21, their cousin J.D. Davenport, 18, James Jackson,  Jr., 17 and his brother, Johnny, 18. They were arrested in 1976 and indicted on  charges of armed robbery and first-degree murder of a white farmer who was a  customer at a small country store. They were indicted despite the fact that the  five young men had been seen by neighbors at the time of the crime one and a  half miles from the armed robbery, despite the fact that no weapon or useful  fingerprints were found, and despite a shaky eye-witness story. As part of the  indictment, the state made it clear that, if convicted, the youth would be given  the death penalty. 
   
  My whole body shook as I drove my rental car down the two-lane Georgia,  country road. I thought, “Those guys are following me!” I tried to speed up,  but the next thing I knew the car with the two white men tailing me was coming  up on the left side of my car, trying to push me off the road. As I swerved to  the right, the car sped passed me, a hazy image in the soft diffused light of  early evening and in my moment of absolute fright. Now aware that they had gone  and were probably not turning around, I was one grateful woman.  
    
    It was a hot August day in Dawson,   Georgia in  1977. I had just left the home of Mrs. Fannie Lou Watson, the mother of  Roosevelt Watson, one of the five young defendants of the Dawson Five, a case that became a cause  célèbre because of its blatant injustice and racism. The case created national  outrage when it became clear that it included coerced confessions, including  the one from Roosevelt who later said:
They told me the sheriff wanted to see me. They took my hand prints.  They asked me about it. I told them I didn’t do it. They told me they gonna put  me in the electric chair, gonna put me in prison all my life. They had these  two things hooked to my fingers. Had a thing on my arm, real tight. Said they  gonna electrocute me if I didn’t tell ‘em.  
     
    The pro bono attorney of these five young men was Millard Farmer, the  brilliant, internationally known trial lawyer of the Atlanta-based Team  Defense, a legal project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which did mass  mailings and fundraising for the case.   
     
    On that hot August day, Millard and I had just finished visiting with  Mrs. Watson, her son, and James (Junior) Jackson,  of the Dawson  Five at the end of the first day of the pre-trial hearings. Millard had headed  out in his car, and I left a bit later, getting turned around as I tried to  follow him. I figured the two white men in the car knew I was the black woman  who had been in the courtroom earlier that day, the woman from the National  Council of Churches, which was responsible for posting part of the bail for  members of The Dawson Five. In addition to wanting to chase this black outsider  out of town, the white men were no doubt angry about William Rucker’s stunning  testimony at the trial. Rucker, white, a former Dawson policeman and the  defense’s principal witness, broke all the rules of old south white law  enforcement and testified that he had been present when a Terrell County  sheriff’s deputy put a pistol to the head of one of the defendants, James  Jackson, Jr. 18 cocked it, called him a “nigger” and ordered him to find the  murder weapon. To a stunned courtroom, Rucker also testified that he saw and  knew about other threats and coercion as well used to obtain the confessions.13     
On December 19, 1977, less than four months after the  pre-trial hearing, the Dawson Five were freed. These five black teenagers,  whose families were poor, were kept for periods ranging from nine months to nineteen  months in the Terrell County Jail awaiting trial or waiting to be released on  bond, which was $100,000 for each young man. Although finally free, these five  young men suffered a terrible injustice.   
The bail funds that enabled some of the Dawson Five to  get out of jail before the pre-trial hearing came from several sources, and as  each bail was raised, the five youth met in jail and collectively decided who  would be released with each bond, with only Roosevelt and James Jackson being  released. They decided that Roosevelt should  go first since he was pegged as having fired the trigger that killed the white  customer and was the most vulnerable and that James would go next since he was  the youngest. Roosevelt’s bail was insured by an Atlanta resident, who signed a bond based on  the $125,000 value of her home. James Jackson, Jr. was released with $50,000  raised by individual contributions to Team Defense and $50,000 from the  Ecumenical Minority Bail Bond Fund (EMBBF) of the National Council of Churches  (NCC), which I staffed with the Reverends Jim West,  Ricardo Potter, and Joan Martin.  
VI. Reverend  Meri-li Douglas: An Ecumenical Lesson 
Several years ago, I served as Presbyterian Campus  Minister at a historically African American university in North Carolina. Like all colleges and  universities, the administration takes a survey of its incoming first year  students to create a profile of that class. I took an active role in collecting  and analyzing the data. It was no surprise that the largest percentage of  students were from poor and blue collar working families in rural communities. One  question on the survey asked students to identify any religious affiliation. Most  responses were “Baptist,” “non-denominational,” or “other” –a fairly accurate  accounting of African American religious expression in the state. So it was  also no surprise that only three students identified themselves as  Presbyterian. 
I quickly learned that students attracted to campus  ministry were from strong Pentecostal, evangelical church communities. At my  first gathering of students (as it happened, all freshmen), I asked them to  introduce themselves and say what church they attended back home. I expected  them to say they were Baptist or that their local church was  non-denominational. The twelve students in the room began to express confusion  about the word “denomination.” It became clear to me that they were unaware of  any connection their local congregation had with any larger organized religious  institution. As one flustered student told the group: “My family and I go to …  (here she gave a rather long name that included words such as “apostolic,”  “free” and “Word of God”) Church. It’s a Christian Church! That’s all. We never  call it anything else.”   
Most had never heard of Presbyterians. They were  surprised to learn that, in order to become an ordained Presbyterian minister,  I had to attend graduate school, meet rather rigorous academic standards, and  demonstrate biblical and theological knowledge well beyond bible stories and  identifying specific Bible verses on demand.   
While they found my faith journey rather curious, I found  theirs equally intriguing and learned much from them as they shared their  understanding of Christianity and discipleship. On the one hand, for them it  was a “stand alone” faith. These young adults had been given a faith firmly  anchored in a strictly structured Christian standard of morality. I came to  honor their faith and the way it grounded them with a palatable sense of power  and sustenance. They had accepted those standards as spiritually sustaining,  and their families had sent them off to college with admonitions to remain  faithful. It was my role to  challenge and affirm their faith  journeys.   
At this first encounter, I had been offered a very  special opportunity to both confirm their faith and have it nurtured by a  Christian expression vastly different from their own. Most of those gathered  did not understand that their independent church belonged to or was a component  of the Church universal. I set aside the program I had planned for the group  and used the opportunity to introduce them to the idea of a Universal Church  and the spectrum of expression it represents.   
Over the years, I have reflected on this experience. It  offers particular insight as I consider Christian ecumenism, because meaningful  ecumenical activities best serve those in the pews. Ecumenical services  heighten the awareness of the practical realities that shape and inform  day-to-day Christian experiences for those who are not formally theologically  trained believers. Effective ecumenism enhances the dialogue between scripture  and reality and any discussions, documents, or social actions must engage many,  many diverse realities.   
Notes 
1. “Gonna Lay Down My Sword and Shield.” (Down by the Riverside.)  Traditional. 
2. “Ecumenical.” Online Etyomology Dictionary.  Online location: http://www.etymonline.com  accessed 19 March 2009 
3. The Internet Medievel Source Book. Online  location:  www.Fordham.edu/halsall/sbook2.html#Conc2 accessed 19 March 2009 
4. Ibid. 
5. Sawyer, Mary R. Black Ecumenism: Implementing the  Demands of Justice.Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1994.  p. 1. 
6. Ibid., p. 8. 
7. Paris, Peter. The Social Teachings of the Black Church.Philadelphia,   PA: Fortress Press. p. 129. 
8. Capitol Hill Group Ministry, Interfaith Service of  Thanksgiving Program, Capitol Hill SDA Church, Washington DC,  2006. 
9. “This Is the Day That the Lord Has Made.” Text from  Psalm 118:24. Tune by Les Garrett. 
10. “They Will Know We are Christians by Our Love.” By Peter  Scholte.  
11. “NCC at a Glance: Who Belongs, What We Do, How We  Work Together.” National Council of Churches. Online location: http://www.ncccusa.org/about/about_ncc.htm  accessed 19 March 2009 
12. “A Brief History.” The Interreligious  Foundation for Community Organization. Online location: www.ifconews.org accessed 19 March 2009 
13. King, Wayne. “Prosecution Drops Murder Case against 5  Defendants in Georgia.” The New York Times. 20 December 1977. 
Sample 11 Days Plan for an Ecumenical Celebration 
   
			   |